Haideri history was written by Molvi Haider Ali Ludhianvi which was published by his son named Hidayat Ali after his death in 1922.
This book is written in better form as compared to Alvi history and Molvi Haider Ali eradicates/ compensate many of his previous mistakes.
But his research remain confined with the circle of Ludhyana and its surroundings. If he research area of Jehlum, Kohistan e Namak and Rawalpindi then he did not felt the need to write this book. But, now what he did is enough. One debate which is present in Pakistan also is that some people considered Awon S/O Yallah as an illusionary personality.
And some of them even rejected the arrival of Awon bin Yallah as already mentioned it in “Haideri History” Molvi Haider Ali write on page 2nd
A hoary Abdul Qadir Jallani’s caliph from Awon bin Yallah.
In page 3rd and went to Hind country for preaching of religion. So, that he may give trend of the family “Qadria”. And there is no knowledge when he came? Where he stayed?
But the people of Baghdad linked to Qutab e Hind and he came with his one wife and two sons and for a span/tenure he visited and returned back to Baghdad with his wife and sons.
Write further on the same page because of Hazrat Awon S/O Yallah was from the progeny of Hazrat Abbas /R.A) S/O Hazrat Ali /R.A).
And the Arabia history writers wrote the dates from their travelogue and has wrote all of our families from the progeny of Awon bin Yallah means popular /famous Qutab Shah and it was a big historical fault, who is intended to write history, he was astonished to see dates of Baghdad Shah.
Here notions say that we are the progeny of Muhammad Hanfia S/O Hazrat Ali /R.A) but when see in dates all are find to the progeny of Awon bin Yallah and on the page 4th, Molvi Haider write
Molvi Haider Ali also follow the same Arabic dates and attached the nation in the progeny of Hazrat Abbas Alambardar/R.A).
Here, Molvi Haider has said a talk of decision.
Molvi Haider Ali protesting the dates of Baghdad without any hesitation that there is written Awon bin Yallah. Here if there is a noise of references which are in favor of them, then this matter is sold by Molvi Sahab.
Now, the question is “nations calls” who nation? Here I am going to present the references of “Tareekh Qoum e Awana” The real cousin /son of his uncle) Malik Muhammad Ishaaq’s manuscript.
Who wrote on the page 2nd in the prefaces of family lineage and nasab in Qoum e Awana and in it he write himself the progeny of Hazrat Abbas Alambardar /R.A).
In this regard, there is references related to Malik Muhammad Ishaaq and write an essay in of Malakwaal, Malik Muhammad Afzal Awan in the shumara of “Mahnama ul Awan” August 1972 Lahore.
In tthis essay Malik Muhammad Ishaaq who is in favor of Molvi Haider Ali copy/write the saying of him:
“When he wrote the Aalvi history and Haideri history then my honorable father’s cousin /munshi Wazir Ali Khan Sahab prohibited Molvi to not write the circumstances and incidents which are based on hearsay and induction of Hazrat Qutab Shah.
But that gentleman remained obstinate on his points and wrot many things that are not acceptable to wisdom. Although, there is not mentioned/memoir of traditions and incidents in any authentic book.
He make in fix Awons nations by writing hypothesis and exaggeration. Now, I am asking to these blind followers, that who has made impudence/slattern liners in Molvi Noor ud Din’s respect without any proof and references. They should submission/adoration/prostration/worship in Allah Wahid’s court and take back their words and seek forgiveness.
Otherwise, nation has been aware and know very well your reality that don’t know who instigated you specially Molvi Haider Ali and after his lover fare Malik Sher Muhammad of Kalabagh has wrote many things and failed to present historical references Molvi Haider Ali wrote the family tree of nation in his first book named Alvi History, this family tree is totally contrary to the Haideri History. In Alvi history he wrote the family tree as follow:
Qutab Shah Alvi Naaib Sultan of Sultan Mehmood Ghazi Ghaznawi province Lahore S/O Alif Shah S/O Aaman Shah S/O Daraab Shah S/O Zamman S/O Beehwar Shah S/O NAwab Shah S/O Aaq Shah S/O Shah Skinder S/O Muhammad Hanfia S/O Hazrat Murtaza Ali/R.A)
Introduced a family lineage in Alvi history
Mir Qutab Haider S/O Mir Ata ul Allah S/O Tahir Ghazi S/O Umar Ghazi S/O Muhammad Ghazi S/O Asif Ghazi S/O Bital Ghazi S/O Abdul Manaan Ghazi S/O Awon Skinder Ghazi S/O Muhammad Hanfia S/O Hazrat Ali Murtaza /R.A)
Recently Karim Khan Sahab take references from book named “Zab ul Ansab” has make correction in his recent book “History of Alvi Awan”
Abdul Manaan now write as “Ali Abdul Manaf”
Bohat Dair Ki Meherban Aty Aty
And claimer of Hanfia Awan’s others writers/authors who write Abdul Manaan bin Awon Skinder Ghazi and they vanished it /Awon Skinder Ghazi) without any reason in order to hide their less intellectuality and they make the family lineage as a joke/play changes in colour with time as chameleon /girgit)
There are clouds of unbelievers everywhere, that this tradition is continue till today
There is a discussion on dogmatize family trees I want to clear something other here that Molvi Haider Ali, Sher Muhammad and after them the authors could not take decision that how many sons he had Qutab Shah?
We can assess the lab oarg and hardwork of their research by it.
In Haideri History see Molvi Haider Ali writing on page 52
All those progenies are from Qutab warrior. Their progeny is pervaded in this area. Mir Khan Baghdad has included them in the progeny of Awon Bin Yallah wrongly. Although, Awon came in to Soon Valley with his two sons Muhammad and Abdullah and a wife named Ayesha from Baghdad and they go back with them to Baghdad.
This point has mention in own history of Pandit Lakhi Das that they go back with the his sons and wife.
Here the question which is arises is that is all the researchers/narrators are agreed that they are the son of Awon Bin Yallah then the writers who has write themselves the progeny of Abdullah Golra and matched the family tree with Muhammad Hanfia. What is their reality?
In our opinion Alvi Awan is for they are not even local Rajpoot but has penetrate and their name is just the separation of disintegration in nation by showing themselves Awans.
Here, we had discussed five history books, the books which are the initial book of history.
After that, there was a system and in which, the people who claim to be the progeny of Hazrat Muhammad Hanfia they used frivivolus language and wrote what they had of wish since 90 years and wrote on this concept ideology that write enough false that may truth cancelled by this false. This point of reality and truth has already been proved in Germany but the right to be as the progeny of Hazrat Abbas Alambardar is remain/confirmed.
In one era, one history writer who can write truth is enough for that era.
So, Malik Muhammad Sarwar Khan from Soon Valley had published a book named “ Wadi e Soon Sakesar” since 2002 and in which a chapter named research chapter of Awan History has been included, which is enough to understand Awan History. After that a book published named “ Tarikh e awan Tozeeh ul ansab”.
Malik Muhammad Sarwar was a “alive encyclopedia” who wrote all the /nichor) in this book.
He accept and acknowledged the book “Khulasa tul ansaab” and he had himself seen this book in library of Siaal Shareef.
According to him Malik Sher Muhammad Awan write in his book “Tazkira tul Awan” all these books.
/meezan qabti, meezan hashmi and khulasa tul ansab) are not available in any library of the world. But he had seen a long list/index of the libraries and contacted with the administration for these books, but all responses were in negative.
So, he draw a conclusion that the names of these books and statements of the books all are hearsay.
By chance, he could not pay attention towards a library in which there are many rare books.
My meant to be the great intellectual/education library of “Aastana e Siaal Shareef” there is also a book “Khulasa tul Ansab” is available.
In “Khulasa tul Ansab” the name of Qutab Shah’s Awon bin Yallah and his series reached to Hazrat Ali /R.A) through the medium of Hazrat Abbas Alambardar.
In popular books of Iran and Arabia there is the /Zikar) of Khulasa tul Ansaab.
1) Tabqat ul Nehqah al Bab ul Quran Al salas Ashr page #643
2) Kashaf ul Artyaab al Bab ul Quran al Salas Ashar page #120
3) Jawahir ul Aaqian page#194
4) Aizah ul Maknoon jild 1 page#654
5) Al zama jild 4 page#465
6) History of Ulamay e Kharsoon jild 13 page#33/ 1214
7) Haddiah ul Arafeen jild 2 page#380
8) Aaiqi ul shhiaa jild 1 page# 79/2066
There is mentioned in “Khulasa tul Ansab chapter 10th about the Awon and his progeny. And its Urdu translation have at about all locality Nasaaba Jahang Bahadur, Gul Muhammad Awan, Fidda Qureshi, researcher sultan Muhammad Awan and I also have that Urdu translation. In the light of these line there is no doubt to the Awans of Soon Valley and surrounding area Daman e Koh and region Paktaher to Kalar Kahar on their caste.
Now, there should be one thing in this regard and thinking that the rest of the Awans from Hazrat Abdullah Golra and Muhammad Khundlaan’s progeny/decendents went to Kashmir and Hazara for the sake of preach and populated there.
In Pak o Hind, the facts and figures which are told in the references of Awan tribe, these facts and figures are not accurate in any way.
Alvi Awans who are the progeny of Hazrat Abbas Alambardar, their strength is at about to 3 million. Except, Alvi Awans, there is the large strength of those Awans who are other local newly Muslims who accept Islam on the hand of Hazrat Awon S/O Yallah and after this may be due to complex and in relation to Abdullah Awan they started to be call Awans. Except, these some people who were non Awans public of Awans in Soon Valley and during the attack of Changaiz Khan they run toward Hazara and Kashmir and there they started to be called themselves Awans.
From Soon Valley’s authentic tradition and this point has also been copy/publish in the words of Dr. Sher Bahadur, words are as follow:
“There is too much less strength of Alvi Awans in Hazara and Kashmir remember it”
I go forward by telling that Changez Khan had traced Khawarzam Shah to river of sindh and from this, he did not go forward. The khokhar of Khushaab had cooperate and stand by him / Jalal ud Din Khawarzam Shah) in against/verses to Khawarzam Shah Mughal for Gallantry andfor the sake of respect and survival.
He stayed/remained a span of time in Soon Valley and the currency of his time had been find out in large quantity.
Tullajha near Khura was the substitutability/stubbed of him.
As Changaiz Khan received the news of union army between Jalal ud Din Khawarzam and Khokhars. He sent one of his warrior/gerneel to India.
Tartai came to Khushab from Bahhria by the crossing river and had provek a lot of lots.
By the references of author sheikh Muhammad Hayyat from Sargodha.
Jalal ud Din reached Soon Valley in the shelter of Awans and he had stayed at the spot of Tullajha for 4 years and Khokhar Awan’s duty was for the sake of his protection.
The progeny of Abdullah Golra had bear a lot of/ large loss during the fight with Taari army. There are cemetery/graveyards still on many places of those Alvi Awan who were martyred. One of these cemetery/graveyard is near to Koffri.
We can see at many places the graveyards/cemeteries of martyrs and /ganjaye shedaan) Moozoa Ghuffri /koffri)’s north /Ganj shedaan) is still witness of it. That the Alvi tribe has wrote the history of freedom with their blood by following the steps/way of their ancestors/forefathers of those whose possession is in Soon Valley and Kohistan e Namak.