In this regard, the letter Muhabat Hussain from Syed Wazir Hussain Aalvi” is of great importance before it has been published in Tozeh ul Ansaab page 9. For you
In the name of Allah buahid qum, Muqadassa, Iran.
10 June 2003
Honorable Muhabbat Hussain Awan
Assalam o Alaikum!
Hope you will be fine with the grace of Allah Almighty. I am saying with apologize /sorry) you send to me your book “History Aalvi Awan” but here irresponsive staff of post office send you back.
Then brother their Abbas Awan took it by hand, then we make investigation to relevant person that why it happened? Then we got to know name was not written on the book. So, he send book. That’s why we give and take postages by hand. Because inspite of revolutionized, our post office is still old designed. The things we recommits or deposits is vanished away or received after many times on the opening of book I received your love letter.
According to your indent I dispatched your book at once. Hope you’ll get it you have litrary taste. So, our wish is that you must study/peruse ancient books. So you may know it is a broad field people who take decision hurrily sitting at home, always get repent or regert.
You did not study and read out my short books/briefly otherwise, youmight not objected on it. We paid attention on it historically and religiously point of view /all the progeny of Hazrat Ali are included in /Fatimi and ghair Fatimi) and considered truly in Syed and Aal e Rasool /PBUH)
/content left)
Hazrat Imam Ali /R.A)’s five sons’s progeny came and populated. /some content left written in urdu).
From Al Talibeen to Khulasatal Ansaab there is mentioned five sons of Hazrat Ali’s progeny in Indo Pak. The aware and senseable people preserve their families trees in their heart, when there is circumstances in /proper form) or in favorable then they submit to those who know very well about families trees.
Fear of dictator government and lack of resources are the two causes that there is no written history. That’s why many facts remained as secrets. We feel pleasure when any one write on the progeny of Hazrat Ali /R.A).
Because, they are the oppressed/victim people of history. What kind of cruelty which they did not bear. So on seeing book’s title, I really appreciate you. Although you had committed some hard mistakes of misunderstandings but accuracy is possible. You have realive this history at some extent.
The saying of Hazrat Muhammad PBUH……/quote the hadees here)
Then write the history and circumstances of Aoliya e Allah it is then a grace/reward from Allah /a great reward). According to your saying we presented you book for comments/discussion to Iran’s expert of families trees and presented main parts’s translation, then they got astonished like you said Awans of Ghaznavi History’s hero “Malik Ghazi” as the progeny of warrior Ghazi you told but they are not Aalvi but was just a gerneel.
Some thing was written by Ghazziaa’n history and Behqi History by Dr. Ghani and Dr. Faizi. Same it is upto thinking the deny of progeny of Hazrat Abbas S/O Hazrat Ali /R.A). The books which you has been called liar, are respectable books in these experts of family trees. This century’s well known expert of families trees Late Ayat ul Allah Shahaab ud Din Najfi mentioned in his book Kashaf ul Retaab and he also mentioned in it the respectable and reliable families trees expert, and he affirmed a best/reliable book named Khulasatul Ansaab which is written on Aalvies and write about hi authors
Thus a way, a book Meezan Hashmi later on, it was published by the name of Meezan ul Ansaab and its writer Allama Mohammad Hashmi Al Mutawafi 1381 is also considered to be a respectable/noble expert of families lineage and /Tazkira) name can be found on……
Why and how he will be considered wise who just follow blindly or a personal irriation and envy to Molvi Noor ud Din existences. If anything is not available then doesn’t matter that there is no existences of this thing. 1 percent possibility can make 100 of impossibilities false. Sometime, there is fame of one topic, but reality is totally unlike.
Then it is demand of wisdom and view of scholars is that as it is possible instead of refuse from something. There must be an attempt to collect facts and figures/collect possibilities then it is very proper.
If you have proof of anything then you not deny of others except it. According to Ibn e Khaldun “ History is the name to search the incidents of time and responsibility of a researcher is to find/try the cause and effect /MISSING) neither he/she should be in need to arrange situations. According to his or her sector or taste. Nor he or she should shut the door/ close the door following just on irrelevant point.
And except this,
The expert of Iran’s family trees has also been objected on the family lineage prepared by you.
The reason is that till today neither nasaba nor the person who prepare family tree never mentioned the progeny of Mohammad S/O Abdullah S/O Mohammad Hanfia. But, all mentioned Hurs S/O Ali S/O Mohammad Hanfia’s progeny. On what cause you attached the family lineage to them? You did make it clear/manifest. Previous year I went to Pakistan. There was a convention of all Awans in Pakistan on 22nd April 2002. I was told that you are also coming so, that’s why I accept invitation you not come there but I met there with a lot of scholars and lawyers. No one is agreed upon your point of view.
I met a person of expert Gul Muhammad Awan’s / May his soul rest in peace) and he was also objecting that you imagined the labor and the efforts of the ancestors.
Their family lineage matched to Hazrat Abbas R.A) and there is extra shortness same as the people of Molana Hasaam ud Din from Kashmir were also complaining.
The people who come to the stage most of the told their forefathers/ancestors “Alambardar Karbala Hazrat Abbas R.A)”
Although new selected general sectary Dr. Mohammad Dawood Awan gave the references from his book.
Qutab ud Din S/O Aqeel S/O Hussain S/O Muhammad Hanfia S/O Ameer ul Momineen Hazrat Ali’s progeny.
I met their with another person Sobedaar Muhammad Rafique Aalvi Sahab he also had a family tree which was against to your research and he was stubborn on it and was insisting on it “That this was arranged by Aal Mir Aakasha so it could never be wrong at any cost. I try to make him agree that he may make correction in your lineage prepared by you but in vain he was not even to accept it.
Before sometime, I get the chance to visit corner to corner of the country, in the regaret of “preaching class” and I specially meet the people who are Awans at every place and asked different questions then it was disclosric or revelation in accordance of family lineage and fame of nick name Awans becomes the title as wrong /….) and in the way/medium Barghiz they can’t reached to Hazzrat Ali and all the mediums are correct also, and refused to it is equal to sin, all the people believed and trust onn their family trees. Except this, Attock, Chakwal and Sialkot’s Awans tells this title to just a family name’s extent and their scholars themselves affirmed “We are Awans but not the progeny of Hazrat Ali /R.A). It seems to be it that there is the majority of those Awans who are not Aalvi. While the people of Peshawar, Bannu, D.I Khan, Mianwali, Rawalpindi, Sargodha and Gujrat’s regions those people who remained close to scholars are senseable and educated they just not called to be themselves as Awans but they all also called Saadat Aalvi and described word Awan as a wrong prefix
This thing point is true and not a generation topic or title at all.
No doubt, Nasbia syed is Aalvi. May be/perhaps, due to the envy to Hazrat Ali /R.A) and his progeny, they were given the fame of Awan, Instead of Syed Aalvi by /LINE MISSING)
You also did not point out and disclose the reality in your book. When we reached in Gujrat’s town “shain Paal shareef.
Ramnal Shareef and were meetings to a lot of hoary of Sadaat Noshahi and they hoary told that they are Aalvi Sadaat and the title of their hoary was Nosha that’s why they were to be called “Noshahi Sadaat”.
And then we got books/family trees from them, one of them a book was named “Anwar ul Saadat Fi Atar ul Sadaat” and it was written in the reply/response/positives of Aalvi’s Sadaat and the other book named “Abbasi History” was consisted on the Awans’s ancestors//forefather Hazrat Abbas /R.A)’s memoir.
My points/talks are too long hudoud. And there is no capacity for many things in this letters.
You can evaluate in the light of all justifications and facts and figure and how he or she can deny the progeny of Hazrat Abbas /R.A) by seeing the factual light of hoaryies’s family’s trees of many continues of Aalvi’s scholars.
What is the enoble/nobility and honesty to disobey many of scholars and hoaryies of the nation.
A lot of people demanded to me to write on this topic but I could not pay attention due to my busy routine.
Hope, my book named “Anwar ul Alviya Fi Tarikh Aal e Murtafwiya” will be completed at the end of this year. In which there is response/replies of the crueltyon Aalvi History.
I request you to must read out the book “Ali bin Abi Talib” written by Jorge Jarwaak Maseehi
Instead to read out the book of any religious scholars. So, may you get the mood /temperaments of Aalvi and with the love of Hazrat Imam Hussain /R.A) so may you be successful in Dargha e Mohammadi and Aalvi and in the court of Allah, Wahid.
Hope you’ll not forget me in your prayers, and brother Tahir Aalvi is coming to you it will be bere better if send me your answers/reply, and others piece of writings by his hands and.
Syed Wazir Hussain Aalvi
Islamic Republic Iran
From the above mentioned letter, honorable Muhabat Hussain will definitely think that attacks has been on Awan history without any proofs.